Одну секунду
Что-то сучилось. Попробуйте еще раз.
Is wikipedia a good source смотреть последние обновления за сегодня на .
It's the go-to website for information on just about anything. But is the info on Wikipedia worth it's weight in megabytes? Trace has the answer and tells us about a new plan to up the accuracy of some of its most popular pages. Read More: UCSF First U.S. Medical School to Offer Credit For Wikipedia Articles 🤍 "UC San Francisco soon will be the first U.S. medical school at which medical students can earn academic credit for editing medical content on Wikipedia." Medical Students Can Now Earn Credit for Editing Wikipedia 🤍 "Starting this winter, medical students at the University of California San Francisco will be able to obtain academic credit from an unlikely source: Wikipedia." Using Wikipedia 🤍 "As a tool for scholarly research, Wikipedia can be either a grade-killer or a valuable friend, depending on who you ask and what you hope to accomplish using it. What is fairly certain is that your professor won't let you cite it in a scholarly research paper." Citing Wikipedia 🤍 Most university lecturers discourage students from citing any encyclopedia in academic work, preferring primary sources; some specifically prohibit Wikipedia citations. Wales stresses that encyclopedias of any type are not usually appropriate to use as citeable sources, and should not be relied upon as authoritative." Special Report Internet encyclopaedias go head to head 🤍 "Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries, a Nature investigation finds." Britannica attacks... and we respond. 🤍 Watch More: Are We All Internet Addicts? 🤍 Scientists Vs Internet Trolls 🤍 7 NEW Wonders Of the World: 🤍 DNews is dedicated to satisfying your curiosity and to bringing you mind-bending stories & perspectives you won't find anywhere else! New videos twice daily. Watch More DNews on TestTube 🤍 Subscribe now! 🤍 DNews on Twitter 🤍 Anthony Carboni on Twitter 🤍 Laci Green on Twitter 🤍 Trace Dominguez on Twitter 🤍 DNews on Facebook 🤍 DNews on Google+ 🤍 Discovery News 🤍
We've all been told that Wikipedia isn't a good source for research, but how can it have such high quality information and yet still be susceptible to user vandalism? Naturally, the answer involves robots. Whoopsy by Audionautix is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (🤍 Artist: 🤍
Free Civic Online Reasoning lessons, assessments and videos are available at 🤍 You might have heard that you can’t trust anything on Wikipedia. If that’s the case, then why do professional fact checkers often use it? In this video, we break down the basics of how to use Wikipedia wisely. Based on research with professional fact checkers, the Civic Online Reasoning curriculum from the Stanford History Education Group provides resources to help students become better consumers of digital information.
Wikipedia is making us all dumb and lazy. SUBSCRIBE: 🤍 FOLLOW ME: 🇨🇦Support me on Patreon! 🤍 🤖Join my Discord! 🤍 🇺🇸Follow me on Instagram! 🤍 🇨🇦Read my latest Washington Post columns: 🤍 🇨🇦Visit my Canada Website 🤍 Some music by: Craig Henderson- 🤍 ComradeF- 🤍 HASHTAGS: #wikipedia #rant #videoessay
I love Wikipedia! I even donated to it. But I won't donate again, now that I've learned how BIASED Wikipedia has become. ———— To make sure you see the new weekly video from Stossel TV, sign up here: 🤍 ———— No right-leaning outlets, Fox News Politics, the Daily Wire, the Daily Caller, etc… is considered “reliable” by Wikipedia. None. But even some of the most extreme leftist outlets get a "reliable" badge like “Jacobin," a self-described SOCIALIST outlet. Vox, Buzzfeed News, and Slate are also deemed “reliable” by Wikipedia. Editors may base stories on their reporting. Why did Wikipedia become so biased? Veteran Wikipedian Jonathan Weiss tells me that the site, like academia, has been captured by leftists. Some Wikipedia administrators even brag on their profiles, "this user is a socialist." Another put up images idolizing communist murderers Che Guevara and Vladimir Lenin. These administrators make final decisions about what counts as “reliable," and what goes on Wikipedia. That’s why for years, Wiki's "communism" page made NO mention of the millions killed by that ideology. US border facilities are listed under "concentration camps,” on the same page as Wikipedia’s holocaust facilities. Can we fix this? Wikipedia is supposed to be a site that "anyone can edit," so I made an edit. You can find out what happened in the video above.
Wikipedia is good resource... or is it? Vaush answers this age-old question. Disclaimer: This channel is run by a fan and is not affiliated with Vaush source: 🤍 #vaush #clip ✨✨
An apalling example of of how nitpickers "improve" science articles. Follow also my backup channel at 🤍
Let's talk about Wikipedia. Wikipedia is often maligned by teachers and twitter trolls alike as an unreliable source. And yes, it does sometimes have major errors and omissions, but Wikipedia is also the Internet's largest general reference work and as such an incredibly powerful tool. Today we'll discuss using Wikipedia for good - to help us get a birds-eye view of content, better evaluate information with lateral reading, and find trustworthy primary sources. Special thanks to our partners from MediaWise who helped create this series: The Poynter Institute The Stanford History Education Group (sheg.stanford.edu) Follow MediaWise and their fact-checking work across social: 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 MediaWise is supported by Google. Crash Course is on Patreon! You can support us directly by signing up at 🤍 Thanks to the following Patrons for their generous monthly contributions that help keep Crash Course free for everyone forever: Eric Prestemon, Sam Buck, Mark Brouwer, Naman Goel, Patrick Wiener II, Nathan Catchings, Efrain R. Pedroza, Brandon Westmoreland, dorsey, Indika Siriwardena, James Hughes, Kenneth F Penttinen, Trevin Beattie, Satya Ridhima Parvathaneni, Erika & Alexa Saur, Glenn Elliott, Justin Zingsheim, Jessica Wode, Kathrin Benoit, Tom Trval, Jason Saslow, Nathan Taylor, Brian Thomas Gossett, Khaled El Shalakany, SR Foxley, Yasenia Cruz, Eric Koslow, Caleb Weeks, Tim Curwick, D.A. Noe, Shawn Arnold, Malcolm Callis, Advait Shinde, William McGraw, Andrei Krishkevich, Rachel Bright, Jirat, Ian Dundore Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet? Facebook - 🤍 Twitter - 🤍 Tumblr - 🤍 Support Crash Course on Patreon: 🤍 CC Kids: 🤍
Freddie Sayers meets Larry Sanger. Listen to the podcast version: 🤍 Read the full article here: 🤍 Chances are, if you’ve ever been on the internet, you’ve visited Wikipedia. It is the world’s fifth largest website, pulling in an estimated 6.1 billion followers per month and serves as a cheat sheet for almost any topic in the world. So great is the online encyclopaedia’s influence is so great that it is the biggest and “most read reference work in history”, with as many as 56 million editions. But the truth about this supposedly neutral purveyor of information is a little more complex. Historically, Wikipedia has been written and monitored by a community of volunteers who collaborated and contested competing claims with one another. In the words of Wikipedia’s co-founder, Larry Sanger who spoke to Freddie Sayers on LockdownTV, these volunteers would “battle it out”. This battle of ideas on Wikipedia’s platform formed a crucial part of the encyclopaedia’s commitment to neutrality, which according to Sanger, was abandoned after 2009. In the years since, on issues ranging from Covid to Joe Biden, it has become increasingly partisan, primarily espousing an establishment viewpoint that increasingly represents "propaganda". This, says Sanger, is why he left the site in 2007, describing it as “broken beyond repair”. Follow UnHerd on social media: Twitter: 🤍 Facebook: 🤍 #wikipedia #covid19 #bias
#webdevelopment #webdesign #css Watch as I show you how I would redesign Wikipedia's mobile site if I had the chance. The icons I use: 🤍 Support the channel: 🤍 (accepts PayPal, card, etc). Tools used: HTML, CSS, JavaScript CodePen: 🤍 Wikipedia: 🤍 Music Credits: Beyond The Clouds - StreamBeats - Lofi - Harris Heller
Welcome to ‘therefore solve it now’ In this tutorial, you will learn about How reliable is Wikipedia as a source of information ? So, watch the video till the end and enjoy it. Don’t forget to subscribe and comment below in the box. Thanks for watching - We are here for sharing our knowledge, thoughts, researches, ideology, and own creations for you. I hope you understand and enjoy every single effort. Subscribe to, therefore, solve it now channel and click on the bell icon so that all videos of solve it now are easily available to you. Thank you. Disclaimer: The content in this video is strictly for educational and informational purposes only. Any video may have a slight mistake, viewers should always do their own research before making a decision. This video does not contain anything that is harmful or something that doesn’t want to be on YouTube. © this video follows the laws of YouTube Photo & Video Credits: 🤍wikipedia.org 🤍
Is wikipedia a reliable source? Of all things to get triggered over, this caused some people to post they were unsubscribing to the channel. Yeah, taking Qanon "drops" are a credible source, but professional news agencies with teams of reporters, fact checkers and editors, no, that's all fake and scripted.
When Ken Bazaar was diagnosed with prostate cancer, he turned to Wikipedia for information on his diagnosis. He found links and information that brought him up-to-date on the disease and what he was facing, and it ultimately helped him to decide which treatment was right for him. Doctors see many patients like Ken who are turning to Wikipedia for knowledge. "Is Wikipedia a good source of information?" Dr. Adam Dicker of Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, is a part of the international team of researchers that is trying to answer that very question. They are currently comparing Wikipedia to the National Cancer Institute's Physician Data Query website. And, they've determined that Wikipedia is surprisingly accurate. Because Wikipedia is open to editing and changes by the public, they were surprised to find that there is little amount of inaccuracy and bias in the information found. Although, they do say that Wikipedia is harder to navigate than the Physician Data Query. For more resources, please visit 🤍
Wikipedia is big cringe. There are systematic reasons why it is the way it is, but I mean also some articles just make you think they must've been written by furries or something... I don't use it at all anymore, removed it from my bookmarks and don't plan on using it ever again. DONATE NOW: 🤍 💰😎👌💯 WEBSITE: 🤍 🌐❓🔎 Here's the boomer blogpost I mentioned by Larry Sanger co-founder and long-time critic of Wikipedia: 🤍
Is Wikipedia a reliable source, or is it as prone to bias and false information as any other media outlet? In this video, we explore the fundamental problems of modern Wikipedia, and discover how the website regularly lies to its readers. One of the most basic lies Wikipedia tells is that it has a neutrality policy - in reality, the policy has glaring flaws. It's frequently used to assert liberal left worldviews as fact, as if they were the neutral statements of truth. On issues including (but not limited to) race and crime, drug legalization, and even religion, Wikipedia presents unbalanced and in some cases outright misleading information. The website has gotten to the point that its own co-founder, Larry Sanger, even wrote an article verbally destroying it. The article, titled 'Wikipedia Is Badly Biased' will be linked below. Other sources, including the many different studies documenting Wikipedia's left wing bias, are also linked. Follow me on other platforms! Telegram - 🤍 Bitchute - 🤍 Odysee - 🤍 Gab - 🤍 Citations: Wikipedia Is Badly Biased by Larry Sanger - 🤍 Do Experts or Collective Intelligence Write with More Bias? Evidence from Encyclopedia Britannica and Wikipedia - 🤍 Ideology and Composition Among an Online Crowd: Evidence from Wikipedians - 🤍 Wikipedia Source Analysis - 🤍 Differential rates of disciplinary action reveals evidence of political bias in Wikipedia's arbitration enforcement - 🤍 Music used in this video (in chronological order): Serenity - Prod. Riddiman Journey to Rome Part I - Jeff Van Dyck Autumn - Jeff Van Dyck Rome HQ - Jeff Van Dyck
This video talks about how the world's largest encyclopedia came to be and how it operates differently than most other popular websites. To submit ideas and vote on future topics: 🤍 Patreon: 🤍 Twitter: 🤍 A very special thanks to this wonderful group of Patrons: Amy Westacott, Angus Clydesdale, Brandon L, Brett Walton, Chris Lion-Transler, Christian & Penny Gray, Dominique Dugas, Dustin Van Horn, Dylan Kinnard, Emerald Computers – Jason Dragon, Fortunate Calf, Jesse Long, Jimmy1985, Jon, Julianne Beach, Logan Brown, Marshall Kurtz, Meow Wolf, Michelle Chisholm, Mike Weaver, milkshake, My NameIsKir, Nicholas Murphy, Peter Wesselius, Rob, Robert T Kirton, Sam Bennett, Sirpoptart, Sondre Grimsmo Sinnes, Stewart Tritapoe, Super Duper Paratrooper, Taylor LaBrier, Tristan Williams, Victor Anne, Vincent Frame. Company Declines: Kmart: 🤍 Blockbuster: 🤍 RadioShack: 🤍 Solo Cups: 🤍 Toys "R" Us: 🤍 hhgregg: 🤍 Pan Am: 🤍 ESPN: 🤍 Gibson: 🤍 iHeartMedia: 🤍 Bon-Ton: 🤍 Kodak: 🤍 General Electric: 🤍 Woolworth: 🤍 Dell: 🤍 Sears: 🤍 Payless: 🤍 Hostess: 🤍 Redbox: 🤍 Nokia: 🤍 JCPenney: 🤍 Quiznos: 🤍 GameStop: 🤍 NASCAR: 🤍 Shopko: 🤍 MoviePass: 🤍 Reebok: 🤍 The Gap: 🤍 Pier 1 Imports: 🤍 Sbarro: 🤍 AOL: 🤍 Long John Silver's: 🤍 Chuck E. Cheese's: 🤍 GNC: 🤍 Website created by - 🤍 Intro Made By - 🤍
Wikipedia now boasts more than 5.7 million articles in English and millions more translated into other languages, all written by online volunteers. Errol Barnett talks to one editor who was named among Time Magazine’s most influential people on the internet. Watch "CBS This Morning" HERE: 🤍 Download the CBS News app on iOS HERE: 🤍 Download the CBS News app on Android HERE: 🤍 Like "CBS This Morning" on Facebook HERE: 🤍 Follow "CBS This Morning" on Twitter HERE: 🤍 Follow "CBS This Morning" on Instagram HERE: 🤍 Get new episodes of shows you love across devices the next day, stream local news live, and watch full seasons of CBS fan favorites anytime, anywhere with CBS All Access. Try it free! 🤍 Delivered by Norah O’Donnell, Gayle King, John Dickerson, and Bianna Golodryga, "CBS This Morning" offers a thoughtful, substantive and insightful source of news and information to a daily audience of 3 million viewers. The Emmy Award-winning broadcast presents a mix of daily news, coverage of developing stories of national and global significance, and interviews with leading figures in politics, business and entertainment. Check local listings for "CBS This Morning" broadcast times.
Wikipedia has a page on just about everything — but can it be used as a reliable source? Teen Fact-Checker Pride explains the different ways you can make sure a Wikipedia article is legit, along with tips on how you can make sure you're using the website responsibly. ATTENTION TEACHERS: This fact-check is featured in a free, one-hour lesson plan. The lesson is available through PBS LearningMedia, and includes lesson summary and a handout, among other resources. Go to: 🤍 - Learn more about MediaWise: 🤍 Follow MediaWise on Instagram: 🤍 Follow MediaWise on Facebook: 🤍 Follow MediaWise on Twitter: 🤍 Follow MediaWise on TikTok: 🤍
A quick look at what makes Wikipedia work and what made it one of the most visited sites on the internet. MERCH: 🤍 PATREON: 🤍 REDDIT: 🤍 TWITTER: 🤍 DISCORD: 🤍 Download Wikipedia: 🤍 Sources: 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 Music: "Omission" by Huma-Huma "Talkies" by Huma-Huma "Pas de Deux" by Bird Creek "Nighttime Stroll" by E's Jammy Jams #Wikipedia #Encyclopedia #Internet #Knowledge
It doesn't take more than a minute to debunk a bad claim. Follow me on twitter: 🤍 My patreon: 🤍
In this video we will examine Wikipedia. Can it really be trusted? Can you use it as a basis for your personal study? We will read a few passages in English, Italian and Japanese and I will translate them all for you and we will compare the same pages to see if we reach the same conclusions. At the beginning what you see is my personal nerd room, a small room in my home which works as a time machine to my past where I keep all the things which belong to my teenage years. Follow me on my social networks: 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 Music: intro ES_Knights Templar 1 - Johannes Bornlöf outro ES_Knights Templar 2 - Johannes Bornlöf
This question is asked so many times by my students I thought I'd share with you an analogy I often use, hope it helps!
Teach your students to analyze Wikipedia articles
This video is about Wikipedia Editors Patreon: patreon.com/ghostgum Twitter: twitter.com/notghostgum Shoutout to Squiff for the Art: 🤍 Outro Song: I'm just chillin - Seggito #wikipedia #mods
How reliable is Wikipedia for History?
Wikipedia Day is an occasion to celebrate Wikipedia's birthday. On 15 January 2001, two American entrepreneurs-Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger launched an online encyclopedia.It was called Wikipedia. Despite much criticism early on about inaccuracies, it has gone on to be hugely successful. Know so many interesting fact about wikipedia. Wikipedia’s Main Page has always been its most viewed, followed by Special: Search and Special: Random. People says Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. तेरा तुझको अर्पण के लिए यहां क्लिक करें - 🤍 Install The Lallantop Android App: 🤍 Follow us on: 🤍 Like The Lallantop on Facebook: 🤍 Follow The Lallantop on Twitter: 🤍 Follow Futkar on YouTube for Short videos: 🤍 Follow Latak on Instagram: 🤍 For advertisements e-mail us at: Ads🤍thelallantop.com Produced By: The Lallantop Edited By: Varun
Should we trust Wikipedia as a credible source for our academic writing? In research papers, academic writing thesis, and year projects, you will need sources of information to aid you to complete your task. Wikipedia or Wiki for short has been one of the popular websites to provide resourceful information from time past. But today, there has been a lot of concerns about the information on Wikipedia, most people are asking, is Wikipedia a good source, and can it be trusted as a credible source? Well, that is what we will be looking into today on TechGrocer. Do you want to know how to make a Wikipedia page for your company or research paper or even a project you want people to read about? Wikipedia is hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization that also hosts a range of other projects. Wiki comes in various languages to select from so you can read in your own language. Wikipedia is an online free content encyclopedia project helping create a world in which everyone can freely share the sum of all knowledge. The reason why we ask is Wikipedia reliable is because Wikipedia is based on a model of freely editable content. Though not everyone uses Wikipedia for academic purposes, some want to know how to get a Wikipedia page or how to create a Wikipedia page for a company so that people can read about them. Why not trust Wikipedia if they want to provide sources to aid academic work? Let us know your opinions in the comments. In any academic writing, research is done for credible information. Is Wikipedia trustworthy or has high credibility in its academic sources because of its edit feature that allows anyone to add or delete part of the content from the Wikipedia pages. The reliability of Wikipedia is questioned. Before we dive into the video we will talk about, Can Wikipedia Be Trusted As A Credible Source? Kindly hit the subscribe button and the notification bell so you wouldn't miss any of our future uploads. You can check out these videos from our channel: #Wiki #Wikipedia #WikipediaReliable #CashCowMakers _ Tech companies have significant power over our lives, particularly the new gadgets we use in our day-to-day activities. As part of the future technology and growth world, we have seen the remarkable rise of YouTubers like Marques Brownlee, educating us about tech gadgets, tech applications, the internet of things, and artificial intelligence. TechGrocer as a strategic and dynamic player in the tech niche seeks to cover the current world of technology and send you into the future where futuristic technology like augmented reality is ruling. Join us on this adventurous journey and be part of our educational story. Disclaimer: Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. Tags: new tech gadgets, tech companies, future technology, Marques Brownlee, internet of things, artificial intelligence, futuristic technology, augmented reality, Wikipedia fact or fiction,10 scary Wikipedia pages, can I trust Wikipedia, how to use Wikipedia, history of Wikipedia, what is Wikipedia
No. -Music used- Divider by Chris Zabriskie 🤍 Creative Commons — Attribution 4.0 International— CC BY 4.0 🤍 Music promoted by Audio Library 🤍 Hip Hop Rap Instrumental (Crying Over You) by Chris Morrow 4 🤍 Creative Commons — Attribution 3.0 Unported— CC BY 3.0 🤍 Music promoted by Audio Library 🤍 Feral Chase by Kevin MacLeod Download link: 🤍 Available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.
You could argue Wikipedia is a good example of the internet being a force for good. A free to use site, run largely by volunteers, which provides a service where anyone can educate themselves on various topics. Sure, like everything, it is subject to the biases of its volunteer force, but by and large Wikipedia has a good record on being pretty fair. There is a saying that 'reality has a left wing bias', and that seems to have been the thing that created Conservapedia. This Right-Wing clone of wikipedia claims to reject bias while promoting evolution, blatant conservative opinions and conspiracy theories. .00:00:00 - Conservatives want a safe space 00:03:00 - Conservapedia Origins 00:09:10 - The World View of Conservapedia 00:16:30 - Conservapedia thinks Joe Biden is a Maoist 00:21:40 - The Conspiracies of Conservapedia 00:29:00 - There is no hope for Conservatives My Patreon: 🤍 Follow me on Twitter: 🤍 My Instagram: 🤍 Second Channel: 🤍 My Podcast: 🤍 My Subreddit: 🤍 My Personal Reddit: 🤍 My Medium: 🤍 Alex (guy who did the graphics) YouTube channel: 🤍
How to (properly) use Wikipedia as a source! Too many times I've seen people refer to the user-generated site as a primary (or in worse cases) sole source. That's simply not the case. A proper Wiki-page has references throughout the article called "footnotes" but most people do not investigate them further. Just needed to get this off my chest. It was an extremely cathartic experience. Back to my regular videos, which you can watch here: 🤍 #wikipedia Like me on Facebook! 🤍 Follow me on Twitter! 🤍 MUSIC Jim Yosef - Canary (furnished by NoCopyrightSounds) 🤍 • 🤍 • 🤍 • 🤍 • 🤍
This video is about Wikipedia
This video is a explanation of how Wikipedia works, whether it is biased or not and whether or not you should be using it as a source for your projects. Patreon: 🤍 Subreddit: 🤍 Twitter: 🤍 E-Mail Address: viki1999mail🤍gmail.com The song in the outro was produced by 08 (who gave me no way to credit them), you can listen to the whole remix on my second channel: 🤍 Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 0:56 What is Wikipedia and how does it work 7:46 Examples of Bias 17:41 So will I keep using it? 20:20 Conclusion Sources: Tweet about me 🤍 How Wikipedia works 🤍 Wikipedia’s accuracy 🤍 Video summing up the structure of Wikipedia 🤍 Ideological bias on Wikipedia 🤍 Japanese Wikipedia bias 🤍 Crowd sourced examples of bias in Wikipedia 🤍 🤍 Columbus sending slaves back to Spain 🤍 Conservapedia on Wikipedia 🤍 Conservapedia general information 🤍 Conservapedia on Wikipedia 2 🤍 Conservapedia on Wikipedia 3 🤍 Criticisms of Wikipedia 🤍 My latest video 🤍 Transcript: Hello everybody. If you watched any of my recent videos and had a look at the description or the comment sections, you will have seen one thing. Wikipedia. And lots of angry people who say I shouldn’t use it at a source. It’s gotten so bad that I added an angry disclaimer to my last descriptions because I was frustrated with what I saw as unproductive feedback. Among that was this one tweet which got more likes and retweets than I am comfortable with. It seems some people have serious issues with my choice of sources. So, I am making this video to explain what Wikipedia is, how it works, why it can be a bad source, examples of bias and whether I will keep using it despite all that. And yes, just to prove I can, this video will not cite Wikipedia at all. That being said, let’s start with, what is Wikipedia? Wikipedia is a free online encyclopaedia run by the Wikipedia foundation who are a non-profit organisation. The information on the different pages is added and edited by users. Anyone can make a change. Which seems like it is ripe for misinformation, but if someone makes a change without a citation that change will be overruled. There are volunteer administrators who more or less sign off on the changes people propose. There are unchecked changes on small articles but those are rare. And if the citation is missing then it will say “citation needed”, and there will be a disclaimer telling you that the information may not be reliable. Personally, I once tried to write a Wikipedia article on the new religion I invented, long story. It was immediately flagged by a bot and deleted by an admin. These admins have rights others don’t have, for example they can ban users if they behave badly or make bad faith edits, and if it’s an anonymous user they will ban their IP address. The administrators can also make a page protected. If we look at the page of world war two we can see this little padlock here which tells us this page is protected, meaning without an account you can’t change anything about it. And an account needs to be established before you can make changes. As you can imagine this is used on loads of pages to protect them from vandalism.
Follow me on Instagram 🤍 Dr. Sinthesizer for more videos and content
A quick video explanation of Dr. Johnson's views on use of Wikipedia and other wikis in classwork that requires a scholarly resource. The basic point of the video is that at the college level, and especially the graduate-level, it is important for learners and colleagues alike to consider the level of scholarship they employ as part of their efforts to attribute ideas, figures, facts, and media in their analysis and synthesis of course topics.
wikipedia ki secret trick wikipedia trick wikipedia par aese hatayen faltu ki chinje wikipedia par aese kare padai wikipedia ka istemal kaise karen how to use wikipedia how to remove unnecessary content on wikipedia content remove on wikipedia wikipedia trick wikipedia facts facts about wikipedia how to use wikipedia trick #shorts #wikipedia #freeTech
.svg){kind=small}
